Development

The Hutton

Update 11/20/2020

Last night, a proposal recently redubbed “The Hutton”, Savoy’s twelve unit condominium proposal for 134-138 West Madison was approved 6-1. Pitched as the”last of it’s kind” by Savoy, this project completes their rapid transformation of this block long stretch that up until very recently had been dominated by small businesses located in small one story suburban structures. Council member Liz Gibbons was the lone “nay” vote citing concerns of the project’s variation from the allowable density. While council member Maggie Duwe voiced concerns about the height and noted that she had voted no on the previous two Savoy projects, she stated that given their approval, the height of The Hutton now fit reasonably well within the context provided by its neighbors.

In addition to the benefit of added density and an improved street wall, this project also features items that will improve the pedestrian experience. A six-foot wide sidewalk, considerably wider than most of the sidewalks in Kirkwood, will stretch from in front of The Barclay along S Clay, around the corner and past the Madison facade of the new structure. The plans also call for a mid-block crosswalk to be installed to service the building and it;s adjacent public parking lot. Apparently not included in the project nor on the city’s agenda is a four-way stop for the intersection of Madison & Clay, a corner that is soon to be one of the most densely populated in the city and is already one of its most dangerous.

Kirkwood City Council has now approved 164 additional units of housing in the downtown area in the last month.

Original Story 08/14/2020

The final piece of the puzzle might be dropping into place along West Madison. Savoy has submitted a proposal for a new 12-unit condominium project at 134-138 West Madison for next week’s Planning & Zoning meeting. That project would join two other developments by Savoy, The Madison completed in and The Barclay still under construction, on the hottest one block stretch in Kirkwood.

Each of the units in the four story structure looks to weigh in right around the 1,900 sqft mark and features the large balconies that have become Savoy’s signature differentiating feature. At 12 units and 24 parking spaces, the two-to-one ratio is slightly annoying to me, but the fact that the project will share The Barclay’s existing driveway instead of requiring it’s own is enough to let me swallow that contention. I would also prefer The Barclay’s fourteen units to this proposal’s twelve (the same as The Madison), but I assume so would Savoy if they thought it was feasible, so I’m not going to lose too much sleep over it. Two small homes that have been long been used to house small businesses are to be razed to construct the project.

On the whole, the design looks very solid (and nearly identical to its two other contemporaries). If P&Z or City Council were interested in improving the design, the most obvious tweak is to improve its street frontage by mandating that the first floor balconies be directly accessible from the street (via a couple steps) rather than forcing residents to enter and exit through the main door and hallway of the building. This would certainly improve the pedestrian experience by giving them something other than a slate wall to look at as they walked by. I also think it would be preferable to residents by facilitating more of those small-town interactions (waving to someone sitting out on their front porch or inviting an old friend walking by in for a beer).

The Transformation of Madison

If this project is approved, and all indications point towards that being the case, it will mean the completion of 38 new homes over along a on a street that previously featured none, all within a three year stretch of time.

While it’s tempting to argue that Savoy has tapped into some magical formula to gain approval of their projects when so many other developers have struggled to do the same in Kirkwood, the far more plausible explanation is simply that there are no single family homes, the natural constituency for NIMBYism, within a block of any of these projects. Without an army of angry homeowners to organize against these projects, they are tweaked here and there but tend to sail through. It certainly helps that The Madison came out looking very nice. It’s hard to argue that the subsequent Barclay or this new project might “ruin” Kirkwood when an essentially identical project two lots down very clearly didn’t, but rather added to it.

I love Savoy projects on West Madison because they add density and they’re basically as surefire as it gets. With that being said, it’s hard to determine where multi-family projects go from here now that all the no-brainer lots are occupied. In an ideal world, Kirkwood would issue a Request for Proposals on the city owned lot that sits amidst the three condo buildings and see if they get anyone to bite (it’s a no-lose situation, if they don’t get anything they like, they can just keep the parking lot!), but that doesn’t seem very likely to happen. There are other options though.

The apartments that sit adjacent to (just South of) the Barclay probably would be well served to be replaced by something a couple of stories taller and twenty units or so denser. And West Monroe, on the back side of the same block, seems destined for a breakout. Other leading candidates include other projects currently owned by Savoy. The building at left below, located directly across the street from the buzz that is Mission Taco, seems primed to be replaced sooner rather than later while the second floor office space (at right) that is seemingly perpetually for lease by Savoy (and located on the very same scorching hot block of Madison) seems like it should very obviously be converted to a residential use.

But enough with all the speculation. For now, before we’re forced to roll our rock back up the hill that is The James and Commerce Bank in a couple short weeks, let’s enjoy the possibility that Kirkwood might soon be making room for twelve new families worth of potential Gadfly readers. It’s the little things that get ya through, baby.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gary Kreie

Interesting. I county 12 units and then another whole floor on top. So what is the top floor for? 2 more large penthouse units? Or other amenities? Maybe amenities the Barclay residents could share alone with the garage ramp.

Gary Kreie

Could it be a 14 or 16 condo building? Or did they call it a 12 condo building?

Gary Kreie

I listened to the zoom P&Z meeting Thursday August 19th, and learned that there will be 12 units — four on each of the lower two floors and then two on each of the upper two floors — essentially making 4 penthousish large condos — two on the 3rd and 2 on the 4th floors.

Ellen Gough

Hello,
I live in a house on West Madison. This is a home, not a commercial business.

Michael Carmody

Pedestrian Safety Guide
A pedestrian friendly Venue should follow these guidelines;
The minimum sidewalk widths for cities large and small
are:
Local or collector streets 1.5 m (5 ft)
Arterial or major streets 1.8 to 2.4 m (6 to 8 ft)
CBD areas 2.4 to 3.7 m (8 to 12 ft)*
Along parks, schools, and other major pedestrian generators 2.4 to 3.0 m (8 to 10 ft)
*2.4-m (8-ft) minimum in commercial areas with a planter strip, 3.7-m (12-ft) minimum in commercial areas with no planter strip.
Sidewalk Buffer Width
Buffers between pedestrians and motor vehicle traffic are important to provide greater levels of comfort, security, and safety to pedestrians. Landscaped buffers provide a space for poles, signs, and other obstructions; they serve as a snow storage area; and they protect pedestrians from
splash. The ideal width of a planting strip is 1.8 m (6 ft). Minimum allowable landscape buffer
widths are:
Local or collector streets 0.6 to 1.2 m (2 to 4 ft)
Arterial or major streets 1.2 to 1.8 m (4 to 6 ft)